Page 2 of 11

Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 5:43 am
by call me brett
hes still the man!

Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:47 pm
by MissWhibley
cone is cool, i like him with black hairs, and i guess he as a special kind of playing the bass!
well he is funny!! :P

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 4:53 am
by nobrains41
he is funny too,well not as funny as stevo je,but he seems to be like the shy guy of the band,and he is great at playing bass!!!!!

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:45 pm
by JESSter
have you noticed that cone looks a bit like johnny rotten? just a little bit.

Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:32 am
by Vani
Cone is skinny and good looking guy.

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 3:56 pm
by Mr. Penguin
Cwnt.
;)

...
;)

Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 3:59 am
by Mike
he always does the same moves with his bass, like when he lifts up his bass or swings his arm up

Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:34 pm
by Mr. Penguin
He has cool hair.

Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 12:58 pm
by Pull_The_Curtis
Fishbone wrote:
Nic wrote:Cones cool. But sad to say

Mark Hoppus>Cone

Sorry. :cry:
I agree :?
People. Remember, Mark Hoppus is 7 years older than Cone, this meaning more experience genrelly meaning a better bassist. But Sum 41s music is much harder to play than Blinks. Being a guitarist myself I dont know a hell of allot about Bass, but Sum 41s guitar, inparticualr the solos and stuff are much harder than blink. Is this the same for a bassist? A bassist could fill me in.

Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 1:00 pm
by Pull_The_Curtis
Oh and Cones awesome. Seems very easy going and laid back, very reserved but rocks out at a show. I love his kick in the air during Over My Head (Better Off Dead) as the chorus starts. Great guy. also always replies to questions.Love ya Cone!

Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:47 pm
by Vani
Oh ya you're right, he's also answering questions! He get many messages each day but he tried to answer them all! Ah Cone.. :roll: :roll:
haro657 wrote:he always does the same moves with his bass, like when he lifts up his bass or swings his arm up
And that's awesome.

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:51 pm
by JESSter
curtis_sum_41 wrote:Is this the same for a bassist? A bassist could fill me in.
yeah. cuz i like to play it perfect and so that it'd go with the rhythm and everything, and i've played blinks and sums songs (by ear) and cone playes much more with all the little things and everything what completes the song and makes it what is it. blink is more like idk just playin like a-a-a-a-d-d-d-d-e-a-a-d-a-a u know :lol:

but still u notice that hoppus has that experience and doesn't always need all the perfecting things

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 9:39 pm
by charle22
Mark also sings
his voice is awesome

although cone does sing in the operation...

Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:01 pm
by Phili
WHY are people talking about Mark? I know that most of you are die-hard Blink/Plus 44 fans but this is a Sum 41 board and a Cone thread.

Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 12:56 am
by jpinero
curtis_sum_41 wrote:
Fishbone wrote:
Nic wrote:Cones cool. But sad to say

Mark Hoppus>Cone

Sorry. :cry:
I agree :?
People. Remember, Mark Hoppus is 7 years older than Cone, this meaning more experience genrelly meaning a better bassist. But Sum 41s music is much harder to play than Blinks. Being a guitarist myself I dont know a hell of allot about Bass, but Sum 41s guitar, inparticualr the solos and stuff are much harder than blink. Is this the same for a bassist? A bassist could fill me in.
Generally, bass is usually easier, unless they have a solo, then it's definitely harder.

Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:23 pm
by Vani
Phili wrote:WHY are people talking about Mark? I know that most of you are die-hard Blink/Plus 44 fans but this is a Sum 41 board and a Cone thread.
lol because someone start mentioned Mark.

Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:33 pm
by Phili
Then why wasn't it left at that?

Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 6:42 pm
by Jon Nolan
Yeah, this is supposed to be a 'Cone' exclusive thread.

Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 4:07 pm
by TheRealUnderclassHero
Sorry to bring it up again, but Mark Hoppus was only good because he could play complicated bass lines and sing at the same time. That's pretty hard to do. However, Cone is in general better than Mark, because he creates better bass lines that are in contrast with the guitar but on the same scale.
Therefore, Cone>Mark Hoppus.

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 2:03 am
by Rick
TheRealUnderclassHero wrote:Sorry to bring it up again, but Mark Hoppus was only good because he could play complicated bass lines and sing at the same time. That's pretty hard to do. However, Cone is in general better than Mark, because he creates better bass lines that are in contrast with the guitar but on the same scale.
Therefore, Cone>Mark Hoppus.
BAH! mark hoppus and complicated bass lines should never be used in the same sentence unless theres a "never has played" in between. i love blink, but they dont have great bass, it follows the guitar on almost everything it does, but yes. cone is ALOT better, cone isnt even a good bassist by any means, but better than mark.