Noots VS. We're All To Blame

Laxman 41 · Post by **Laxman 41** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:16 am

Ok, so I read somewhere that they were origianlly going to release Noots as the first single off chuck, but then Deryck wrote we're all to blame and released that one, anyway, which one do you think they should have released as the first single, personally I think they should have released Noots

sebbe41 · Post by **sebbe41** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:40 am

Noots!

washburn · Post by **washburn** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:07 am

really? i don't think noots sounds like a first single :? i think we're all to blame

ptido · Post by **ptido** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:56 am

We're All To Blame is a better representation of Chuck.

But i've listenned We're All To Blame too much so i'm tired of listenning it so now i prefer noots.

I don't really know which one is the best as a single.

Rick · Post by **Rick** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:34 pm

noots is such a goodd song, how could it not even make the album

Hentaiman · Post by **Hentaiman** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 2:43 pm

As much as i love Noots, and it could work just fine as a single, it just wasn't good for a first single. maybe for second.
I mean, for a first single, We're All to Blame was great to represent what Chuck is all about - thrash metal riffs, catchy and harsher tunes, mature lyrics, and how its changes from crazy metal verses to a slow chorus and stuff like that, so it was really great,
but no doubt Noots could be the third single, instead of Some say. don't get me wrong, i like Some say a lot but Noots could be a great single to finish the album, and it could be a single anyway, but the thing that sucks the most is that it never even got to appear on the album.
it's just a bonus track and a track on the Fantastic Four OST.
it's not even an album track, which sucks, how could sums not get it into the album? it could simply replace Slipping Away or Open Your Eyes (which is also great song! but Noots is better).

http://www.last.fm/user/cbar05 · Post by **Bobbyjames** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:41 pm

i love Noots, such an awesone song, but yea, a first single off the album probably did work better using We're All To Blame, it does kinda sum up the sound of the album better

I'm A Cunt [*banned*] · Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:44 pm

NO they werent going to realese it. it was only going to have the spot We're All To Blame has on the album. they never said if it would be a single or not.

Hentaiman · Post by **Hentaiman** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:08 pm

yeah, i also like heard that it was supposed to be an official song on the album, 'till Deryck completed writing We're all to blame which took it's place on the album, that i heard too.
Still, Noots is better than some songs on Chuck and could easily replace one of them, as i said, Slipping Away for example.

samueeL · Post by **samueeL** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:30 pm

Noots.

Janet · Post by **Janet** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:48 pm

Noots ftw.

SociallyInept · Post by **SociallyInept** » Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:13 pm

Why couldn't they just put Noots after 88? UH had 14 tracks so why couldn't Chuck?

Tiny *[Banned]* · Post by Tiny *[Banned]* » Mon Oct 29, 2007 10:47 pm

Were all to blame

Byzzy · Post by **Byzzy** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:07 am

we're all to blame was a good choice

Post by **Ken** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:10 am

DOUBT that's true, but Noots.

Mike · Post by **Mike** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:30 am

it wasnt going to be a single, it was just replaced by We're all to blame

it would of been sweet to hear Noots after listening to No Reason

I'm A Cunt [*banned*] · Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:46 am

Mike wrote:it wasnt going to be a single, it was just replaced by We're all to blame

yea thanks i just said that.

Hentaiman · Post by **Hentaiman** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 10:52 am

SociallyInept wrote:Why couldn't they just put Noots after 88? UH had 14 tracks so why couldn't Chuck?

good point.
I mean, really, that way, there's no need even to replace anything, just have 14 tracks, there are albums in this world that have a lot more tracks, like 15 to 17 standart without bonus tracks, so they really should've consider it, Noots is a great song.

Post by **TomiT14** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 3:07 pm

Hentaiman wrote:
SociallyInept wrote:Why couldn't they just put Noots after 88? UH had 14 tracks so why couldn't Chuck?
good point.
I mean, really, that way, there's no need even to replace anything, just have 14 tracks, there are albums in this world that have a lot more tracks, like 15 to 17 standart without bonus tracks, so they really should've consider it, Noots is a great song.

Yeah, but the ending of 88 represents the ending of the whole album imo.
First a great solo, then a slow part in the end, it's a great way to finish an album.

Noots could have been placed somewhere between Dirty Faces and Some Say imo, to make the album include 14 tracks.

cool kids · Post by **cool kids** » Tue Oct 30, 2007 8:45 pm

noots should have been on the album but not as first single