Media sections - "Requires 100-200 posts to enter."!!??

[patenttiftw]

Really you guys should take that awful thing off! I can't post on my favorite sections anymore. I'm never gonna make that 100-200 milestone, because i talk no bullshit

[Shiv]

or, you could contribute alot to topics (such as i am doing right now)

[Queso Man]

or, you could contribute alot to topics (such as i am doing right now)

WTF, you're not contributing, all you're doing is posting filler info that has no impact on the topic at hand.
Really, the post count requirement leads to a lot of spam. It brings noobs down to a level where posting uselessly is acceptable. I read these forums a lot, but hey, if I don't have anything to add to the discussion, I won't.

[withchappedlips]

The reason the media sections require 200 posts to enter is because we don't want people coming on to this forum to just leech media. I am a strong supporter on the 200 post lock. I suggested the idea. With the lock, it prevents people that don't post to come on here and just steal a bunch of media. This isn't the only site with a lock on the media section. I'm sure if you went to enough forums you'd see quite a bit of them with a lock.

You can say that the guy doesn't contribute to this forum... but at least he's an active poster. I'm sure he has at least 200 good posts.

Just start posting more. You'll realize that 200 posts isn't that hard to get.

[Shiv]

or, you could contribute alot to topics (such as i am doing right now)

WTF, you're not contributing, all you're doing is posting filler info that has no impact on the topic at hand.
Really, the post count requirement leads to a lot of spam. It brings noobs down to a level where posting uselessly is acceptable. I read these forums a lot, but hey, if I don't have anything to add to the discussion, I won't.

bitch


and no...it takes about 30 seconds to make a contributing remark to a topic
noobs dont have to spam, just contribute
even an works fine
yesh its only 200 posts...i do that in my sleep

[Druska]

i persoanlly think that 200 is too much it'd be ok with 100

[withchappedlips]

i persoanlly think that 200 is too much it'd be ok with 100

No. 200 is hot.

[Bass Cone]

lulz it shuld be 182 posts rite guise?

[HilgaMan]

Definitely^

[Shiv]

i persoanlly think that 200 is too much it'd be ok with 100

No. 200 is hot.

[tomhoppus]

lulz it shuld be 182 posts rite guise?

no it shuld totly be 41 or 44

[Bass Cone]

lulz it shuld be 182 posts rite guise?

no it shuld totly be 41 or 44

o rite i 4got this wuz 4 sum41

[withchappedlips]

lulz it shuld be 182 posts rite guise?

no it shuld totly be 41 or 44

Kay. 241 is fine by me.

[tomhoppus]

tbh, it should be 3707 posts minimum

[Shiv]

tbh, it should be 3707 posts minimum

woah

tom are u the post leader??

[tomhoppus]

tbh, it should be 3707 posts minimum

woah

tom are u the post leader??

Yes.

NOW it needs to be changed to 3708. Nice job

[Childish Gambino]

Stop complaining, the limit is here to stay. If you want media, you can't just be a leech, you have to contribute to the forum.

Like 200 posts is really that much?