Deryck Interview: Sum41 France

Check here for all of the latest Sum 41 (related) news!

Moderator: News Posters

Forum rules
While we welcome the re-posting of news items, we ask that all original items are credited & linked back to us.
User avatar
TomiT14
Moderator
Posts: 4261
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:19 pm
First name: Tomi
Age: 31
Gender:
PSN ID: TJT41
Last.fm Username: TomiT14
Twitter: TomiT14
Location: Espoo, Finland

Re: Deryck Interview: Sum41 France

Post by TomiT14 »

Jeremy Kill wrote:I feel like two years between albums is a happy medium.
To me, 2 years should be a minimum. Less than that would be way too quick imo. It's possible to write a great record in less than two years, but I'd rather enjoy and listen to the record for a while rather than getting a new one only one year apart.

4 years might be too long between albums, so I'd go with 3.
User avatar
Gregorovich
Underclass Hero
Posts: 3145
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 11:25 am
First name: Gregor
Age: 21
Gender:
n00b: Jake
Last.fm Username: grgrlove
Location: Leicester

Re: Deryck Interview: Sum41 France

Post by Gregorovich »

TomiT14 wrote:
Jeremy Kill wrote:I feel like two years between albums is a happy medium.
To me, 2 years should be a minimum. Less than that would be way too quick imo. It's possible to write a great record in less than two years, but I'd rather enjoy and listen to the record for a while rather than getting a new one only one year apart.

4 years might be too long between albums, so I'd go with 3.
It's just one way in which the music industry has changed. Several decades ago, making and playing music would be a full-time job without much 'time off' except hiatuses. Look at The Who at its peak - wrote and recorded Tommy in '69, toured it until '71, wrote and recorded Who's Next and toured that until '73, then wrote and recorded Quadrophenia. No time off, and three albums released and toured in 5 years. And those have gone down in history as three of the greatest albums of all time.
fuck this signature nonsense
User avatar
Jeremy Kill
Moderator
Posts: 12879
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 11:57 pm
Gender:

Re: Deryck Interview: Sum41 France

Post by Jeremy Kill »

Gregorovich wrote:
TomiT14 wrote:
Jeremy Kill wrote:I feel like two years between albums is a happy medium.
To me, 2 years should be a minimum. Less than that would be way too quick imo. It's possible to write a great record in less than two years, but I'd rather enjoy and listen to the record for a while rather than getting a new one only one year apart.

4 years might be too long between albums, so I'd go with 3.
It's just one way in which the music industry has changed. Several decades ago, making and playing music would be a full-time job without much 'time off' except hiatuses. Look at The Who at its peak - wrote and recorded Tommy in '69, toured it until '71, wrote and recorded Who's Next and toured that until '73, then wrote and recorded Quadrophenia. No time off, and three albums released and toured in 5 years. And those have gone down in history as three of the greatest albums of all time.
I'm not a huge fan of The Beatles, but I'm sure they were the same way. Just from looking at Wikipedia, they released two albums a year for '63, '64,' and '65. Six albums in three years!
User avatar
Ardi41
Dr. Rocco
Posts: 1073
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:26 pm
First name: Ardi
Age: 29
Gender:
PSN ID: ArdiSpleen
Instrument 1: Guitar
Instrument 2: Magic Stick
Location: Germany

Post by Ardi41 »

well the thing is, that it already has been 2 years since SBM came out, so now we know that it will be at least 4 years+ between the albums...
Post Reply